Muller method to handle life challenges. Keeping in mind

Muller
offers numerous conversation starters on a few philosophical points of view to looking
at being religious, approaching it with a receptive outlook, that religion
itself can ruined by unspiritual impacts (Muller page, 17). He affirms that, individuals
all in all frequently longs to rise above, their own encounters and themselves.
While one can be fruitful at numerous things in life, for example, profiting,
have a family and hold intense positions is not enough to complete life but the
inquiries that should boggles one’s brain is there anything else that completes
life, called religion. If this is true, are we willing to work at deep sense of
being and hold on to the calling of our profession of faith, without faltering
when challenges emerge and are we willing to contemplate that honest to
goodness religion is to show love and sympathy for the world by and large, with
the deep desire to have an impact in the life of others.

Muller
underlines, interpendence, talking about a more noteworthy fulfillment in
taking care of others, denying yourself knowing you are having a positive effect
in the lives of others with no reward consequently. He stated, most profound
sense of being trustworthiness is an adjust of inward and outside elements. (Muller
page 20) He trusts that otherworldly existence of mindfulness and self-feedback
is fundamental for our souls, which if not being distinguished, will hamper our
motivation in humankind. Hence association is a superior method to handle life
challenges. Keeping in mind the end goal to better comprehend
religion itself.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

 Muller showed to better understand theology, it
is important to make inquiries, with a specific end goal to completely
comprehend God itself. He expressed, in what manner can a man know God without
addressing what God look like? (Muller page, 22) It’s the same in our regular
daily existences, the more you make inquiries about God, the more you will find
our relationship will extend, empowering us to relate better to both God and
man.   Muller states, there are difficulties to be
experienced with a perspective that can comprehend and regard the perspectives
of others, even while interfacing us emphatically to our own roots. (Muller
page 24) Any world view must face key inquiries, for instance, what assets
would I be able to draw on? Is there a God? or on the other hand, Is God a
Creator who is in association with creation? Will God help us? (Muller page 24)

In
my opinion, I personally believe in God. My life is not complete without God
and I need God to structure my life. I believe God balances out life in all
aspects and it is essential to be like God desiring all the attributes of God himself
because he demonstrated love for all humanity and if may add, for me it’s a relationship
with God and not a religion. I concur with Muller, we need to be interdependent
because by ourselves we are not open to criticism or learning, however being
interdependent, causes us to gain from each other and edify us more about God
himself. Having an opportunity to share our encounters and how we require God
to enable us through regular day to day existences, can profit other people who
may have generally have no feeling of comprehension or direction in life.

  In conclusion,
while life itself is fulfilling in many ways, the need for spirituality with
God completes life. We must be willing to seek after and ask questions about
God to only realize it ties life together. Most importantly, compassion for
human being is fulfilling.